Comments on: NAR delays IDX decision http://www.realestateindustrywatch.com/nar-delays-idx-decision/ Real Estate News - Free and Up to the Minute Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:33:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: adminhttp://www.realestateindustrywatch.com/nar-delays-idx-decision/#comment-429 admin Mon, 18 May 2009 09:56:13 +0000 http://www.realestateindustrywatch.com/?p=203#comment-429 @ Morgan-Yes. That is correct. @ Morgan-

Yes. That is correct.

]]> By: Morgan Careyhttp://www.realestateindustrywatch.com/nar-delays-idx-decision/#comment-428 Morgan Carey Mon, 18 May 2009 03:55:56 +0000 http://www.realestateindustrywatch.com/?p=203#comment-428 I think I found it already"In discussion of the issue at the board meeting, an NAR director from Indianapolis rose to suggest the recommendations be sent back to MLS committee, since this group is already reviewing all aspects of the IDX policy, first implemented in 2002, with an eye toward updating them"It says "from Indianapolis" so I take it that you are assuming (and probably correctly) that this means a MIBOR member. I think I found it already

“In discussion of the issue at the board meeting, an NAR director from Indianapolis rose to suggest the recommendations be sent back to MLS committee, since this group is already reviewing all aspects of the IDX policy, first implemented in 2002, with an eye toward updating them”

It says “from Indianapolis” so I take it that you are assuming (and probably correctly) that this means a MIBOR member.

]]> By: Morgan Careyhttp://www.realestateindustrywatch.com/nar-delays-idx-decision/#comment-427 Morgan Carey Mon, 18 May 2009 03:48:46 +0000 http://www.realestateindustrywatch.com/?p=203#comment-427 Where did you hear that it was "at the request of MIBOR" that the decision was sent back for review? Where did you hear that it was “at the request of MIBOR” that the decision was sent back for review?

]]>